Study Claiming Children Spread COVID is Fraudulent


August 9, 2020 — The obsession of the mainstream media (MSM) with linking children to COVID proves to be false every time. I have been following false reports claiming children are at a high risk of COVID for months and will continue to do so.

On July 31, Forbes published a report titled New Evidence Suggests Young Children Spread Covid-19 More Efficiently Than Adults. The study making this allegation is based upon flawed science that has not been peer-reviewed, does not pass the smell test, and, to top it all off, was funded by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Below is a brilliant post from Facebook that rips the study to shreds.

CHILDREN ARE NOT SPREADERS OF THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS. COVID HAS HARDLY ANY IMPACT ON CHILDREN, ESPECIALLY CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 10. THIS STUDY COMING OUT NOW IS PART OF THE BILL & MELINDA GATES PROPAGANDA MACHINE TO HELP KEEP SCHOOLS CLOSED

***

Originally published on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/stephanie.locricchio/posts/10221985589524116

From my brilliant friend Pamira Bezmen

Everybody is freaking out about the Forbes article that came out that claims children transmit Covid19 the most! I was immediately suspicious because this is against ALL the real-life data we have globally. So calm down, and I will walk you through why you don’t need to be scared of your children and why teachers don’t need to look at innocent babies as walking death sentences.

1. The article is written by William Haseltine. Who has received $30Million from the Gates Foundation since 2015 alone.

2. The Gates Foundation is the primary proponent of Covid related shut downs, and has vested interest in the Covid19 vaccine that Bill wants to mandate to the whole world, even if 50% effective and we must get multiple doses for a virus that naturally has over 99.8% recovery rate.

3. Paper 1:- The paper cited in the article concludes that “However, young children had significantly lower median (interquartile range) CT values (6.5 [4.8-12.0]), indicating that young children have equivalent or more viral nucleic acid in their upper respiratory tract compared with older children and adults”* The paper provides no proof of child-to-child or child-to-adult transmission, but is wholly based on a hypothesis that more viral load “may” lead to something. Even though all real life examples of European schools remaining open during the peak of the pandemic showed no cases of transmission in school settings.* The paper, sadly, but not surprisingly concludes that children should be vaccinated!* Bam! We are back to the main agenda again. All roads lead to Rome, whether they make sense or not.This paper also has multiples of issues that have been pointed out including that the data was obtained with the Abbott PCR test, that is not intended for this type of purpose, that it is from a hospital setting, the size is limited, and the reporting is biased leaving specific indicators, assays and analyses out while focusing on what the authors were trying to conclude.”This analysis relies on not just a small sample but also one primarily obtained from a hospital setting as well as from mild to moderate patients with no additional weighting for the incredibly small incidence of this population within the under-10 population. This study has been interpreted as young people are more likely to carry higher viral load and that in no way is the outcome of this dataset.”

4. Paper 2: The study is not really saying what the article says. The study provided in the link is not based on infections, it is based on positive test results. This simply means that when a child tested positive for Covid-19 in a household so did adults in the same household. Not much of a shock to me!- The study is NOT peer reviewed, and it admits that that adult to adult transmission ends up in more infections. A, yeah! That is what we call a real transmission. – The study is funded by Chan-Zuckerberg Foundation! Hello Mark and Priscilla, now you know why Mark has started censoring Covid-19 related truth and began doing vaccine interviews with Fauci on FB.- CZ Foundation is a pharmaceutical conglomerate that works on novel technology with unlimited funding and fearless young scientists – their claim to fame is the injectible nano-chip, Covid-19 testing and their involvement in contact tracing and data gathering around the world.So, I will go ahead and write this article off as a PR piece backed by dark money aimed at putting fear into trusting citizens to stay in lock down, keep their kids at home, shut down schools probably until there is a vaccine.How evil must a plan be to make a society fear its own children!!!!LINKS BELOW for THE INFORMED CLASS:- Fear-mongering Forbes article:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/07/31/new-evidence-suggests-young-children-spread-covid-19-more-efficiently-than-adults/#12c581c19fdc

JAMA paper: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2768952?utm_source=undefined&utm_campaign=content-shareicons&utm_content=article_engagement&utm_medium=social&utm_term=073020#.XyNyImjnx-k.email

Italy Contact Tracing study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.16.20127357v1?rss=1

Photo attached with William Haseltine’s organization ACCESS Health International’s funds received from Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationFYI: If anyone thinks I should not be diving into the data and papers because I am not a licensed doctor, I will not respond to such idiotic commentary and instead recommend that YOU ALL START DIVING INTO DATA and PAPERS. Because the truth is being hidden and manipulated, and we are being lied to through the institutions we trust. God bless you all!