No children without a serious comorbidity of an additional illness died, and neither did any child between the ages of 28 days and 15 years.
It has been clear from the start of the Covid-19 crisis – from Wuhan’s experience, before cases were confirmed in Britain – that it was a disease with relatively little impact on children. A broad study led by Liverpool University and published in the British Medical Journal today confirms that – and sheds a lot more light on how Covid-19 affects children. The study looks at data from 260 hospitals in England, Scotland and Wales, to which 69,516 patients were admitted with Covid symptoms between 17 January and 3 July. Of these, 651 were aged under 19 and 225 were aged under 12 months. Serious underlying medical conditions were present in 42 per cent of the children.No children without a serious comorbidity died, and neither did any child between the ages of 28 days and 15 years
Most were successfully treated on hospital wards but 116 went on to be admitted to critical care and 58 ended up on mechanical ventilation. In 52 cases, the patients were judged to be suffering from Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome associated with Covid-19 (MIS-C), a condition similar to Kawasaki disease and Toxic Shock Syndrome, that was first identified in London hospitals in March. Six children went on to die. Three were aged under 28 days, had been born very premature and had complex congenital anomalies and bacterial sepsis. The other three who died were in the 15-18 age bracket, two of whom had profound neurodisabilities which compromised their respiratory systems. The other had a suppressed immune system as a result of cancer treatment and was also suffering from bacterial sepsis. No children without a serious comorbidity of an additional illness died, and neither did any child between the ages of 28 days and 15 years. However, the age group 10–14 years was over-represented among those admitted to critical care.
August 23, 2020 — Since the COVID crisis began the lies of children being killed by, and spreading, the novel coronavirus have been constant. These lies morph in various directions based on what the specific agenda is at the time. The two overarching agendas right now are:
Scare parents into not sending their kids to school, and
Create a fraudulent base of science to justify forcing a COVID vaccine on kids.
I have been covering these lies since April. I am just a dad with a blog; I only have so much time to research and write, but this line of lies has particularly pissed me off. Because of this I have jumped on every headline I have seen in regards to the lies of kids dying from and spreading COVID. Below is a summary of what I have helped to document thus far. Click on the hyperlinks to read the full reports.
Texas Lies About 85 Babies With COVID: This was a slight of hand where comments from a Texas official were twisted to insinuate there was an outbreak of babies testing positive for COVID. There wasn’t. There were 85 total cases of children under the age of one who tested positive for COVID in the county since the beginning of the COVID crisis – over a 5 month period of time, and none of those babies died.
In the same report as above I also documented a story about a 9-year-old girl who was said to have died from the novel coronavirus in Florida which was, at best, inconclusive. There were so many questions and inconsistencies with that report, especially since 6 days before she was found dead outside playing with friends and family she had received “a couple of shots.”
8-year-old Queens Boy Almost Dies on a Ventilator: This report exposes the lies told around the mysterious illness “similar to toxic shock syndrome and/or Kawasaki disease,” which we were told was connected to COVID but is not. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) did an outstanding job proving that the cause of this “mysterious illness” was far more likely linked to vaccinations than to COVID. My report focused on how the evidence presented was lacking and incomplete, and that children locked inside for 2 months straight were likely suffering from over exposure to environmental toxins in their homes.
Inflammatory Syndrome Affecting Children: Kawasaki Disease, COVID-19 . . . or Something Else?: This is the CHD report published one week after mine. It is extremely comprehensive and uses mainstream science to completely destroy the ridiculous mainstream narrative that this “new mysterious illness” had anything to do with COVID. Interesting to note: shortly after CHD published this report the narrative that this “new” illness was linked to COVID vanished from the mainstream media and has never returned. Members of my family have even asked me, “Whatever happened to that “new illness” in children?”
It’s gone, because it never existed. The MSM moved on to something “new.”
LIE: KIDS ARE COVID SUPER SPREADERS
The MSM was unable to show COVID is a threat to children. So the new narrative they are trying to seed is that children are a threat to EVERYONE ELSE! Right before the country heads Back to School the media began this narrative with a study funded by none other than The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation:
Study Claiming Children Spread COVID is Fraudulent: On July 31, Forbes published a report on a study saying kids were “super spreaders” of COVID. However the study was based upon flawed science that has not been peer-reviewed, does not pass the smell test, and, to top it all off, was funded by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. In case you’ve been living under a rock for the past 6 months, the Gates want to end in-person education and force a COVID vaccine on every human on planet earth. Maybe when it comes to children and COVID these folks are biased. Just maybe…
Yet Another Study Claiming Kids Spread COVID is Fraudulent: Then on August 20 another study was published in The Journal of Pediatrics which incorrectly concludes that children are “silent spreaders” of COVID. Simply looking at the study itself causes its own conclusion to fall completely apart. I documented what professors, pediatricians, and microbiologists have stated showing this study to be completely misleading and inconclusive. In my opinion this study was an intentional fraud – funded by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as well as Anthony Fauci’s own National Institute of Allergey and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
Phil Kerpen published an outstanding thread on Twitter which went deep into destroying the fraudulent narrative of this ridiculous study:
The actual paper says: "transmissibility was not assessed in this study" https://t.co/Pxt92vz48S
Students and staff with underlying health conditions should receive appropriate accommodations for Back to School if for no other reason than to alleviate the fear that is pervasive and constantly promoted. Fear and anxiety can and do have a negative impact upon an individual’s immune system. However for all others Back to School is safe. Those who are funding the science and narrative telling us it is not have an agenda as I stated at the beginning of this report; that agenda is:
Scare parents into not sending their kids to school, and
Create a fraudulent base of science to justify forcing a COVID vaccine on kids.
How can children be forced to take a COVID vaccine if the disease has little-to-no impact on them and they do not spread the disease to others? NYC Schools Chancellor Richard Caranza has already stated all NYC children must get the as-of-yet-non-existent COVID vaccine when it comes out or they will be permanently banned from stepping into an NYC school building. The fact that there is no scientific basis for such a statement is not only a sign of the Chancellor’s ignorance, but it is a testament to the success of the narrative of lies and propaganda surrounding COVID-19 and kids.
August 21, 2020 — A new study just published in The Journal of Pediatrics incorrectly concludes that children spread COVID more than adults, and are “silent spreaders.” Simply looking at the study itself causes its own conclusion to fall apart horribly. Here are some of the main reasons this study is useless:
The study only used symptomatic children
The study contains no data on asymptomatic spread
It’s a small study using only 49 COVID positive patients
The majority of those 49 patients were teenagers
The study used less than 30 swab samples total from children
Compares children in 1st week of symptoms to adults beyond 1st week
Such a comparison is misleading (and I would say purposefully fraudulent)
The data presented in the study DOES NOT support that children are “silent spreaders”
No cofactors were considered (child age, obesity, etc…)
The study makes suggestions that it has no data to back up
Don’t take my word for this. Go read the comments from the Science Media Center from professors, pediatricians and microbiologists who are the source of my bullet points above:
“The data presented here does not support the claim that children are silent spreaders of COVID-19.” – Prof Adilia Warris, Professor of Paediatric Infectious Diseases at the University of Exeter
“(This study) does not demonstrate, in any way, that children actually spread the virus to adults or other children.” – Dr Simon Clarke, Associate Professor in Cellular Microbiology at the University of Reading
“In my opinion many of the statements in this paper are largely unfounded.” – Dr Andrew Preston, Reader in Microbial Pathogenesis at the University of Bath
Why All This Scientific Fraud?
This is the second study published in August making false claims of children being “super-spreaders” of COVID. The first was funded by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and I have previously published a report proving that study to be a fraud here.
These studies are being published now for 2 reasons:
To keep schools closed and functioning remotely, and
To create a fraudulent scientific paper trail to force a COVID vaccine on children
UPDATE – August 23, 2020 — Phil Kerpin does a phenomenal job on Twitter of going into a stinging analysis proving this “KIDS ARE SUPER SPREADERS” study is a complete fraud. RIP
The actual paper says: "transmissibility was not assessed in this study" https://t.co/Pxt92vz48S
August 9, 2020 — The obsession of the mainstream media (MSM) with linking children to COVID proves to be false every time. I have been following false reports claiming children are at a high risk of COVID for months and will continue to do so.
On July 31, Forbes published a report titled New Evidence Suggests Young Children Spread Covid-19 More Efficiently Than Adults. The study making this allegation is based upon flawed science that has not been peer-reviewed, does not pass the smell test, and, to top it all off, was funded by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Below is a brilliant post from Facebook that rips the study to shreds.
CHILDREN ARE NOT SPREADERS OF THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS. COVID HAS HARDLY ANY IMPACT ON CHILDREN, ESPECIALLY CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 10. THIS STUDY COMING OUT NOW IS PART OF THE BILL & MELINDA GATES PROPAGANDA MACHINE TO HELP KEEP SCHOOLS CLOSED
Everybody is freaking out about the Forbes article that came out that claims children transmit Covid19 the most! I was immediately suspicious because this is against ALL the real-life data we have globally. So calm down, and I will walk you through why you don’t need to be scared of your children and why teachers don’t need to look at innocent babies as walking death sentences.
1. The article is written by William Haseltine. Who has received $30Million from the Gates Foundation since 2015 alone.
2. The Gates Foundation is the primary proponent of Covid related shut downs, and has vested interest in the Covid19 vaccine that Bill wants to mandate to the whole world, even if 50% effective and we must get multiple doses for a virus that naturally has over 99.8% recovery rate.
3. Paper 1:- The paper cited in the article concludes that “However, young children had significantly lower median (interquartile range) CT values (6.5 [4.8-12.0]), indicating that young children have equivalent or more viral nucleic acid in their upper respiratory tract compared with older children and adults”* The paper provides no proof of child-to-child or child-to-adult transmission, but is wholly based on a hypothesis that more viral load “may” lead to something. Even though all real life examples of European schools remaining open during the peak of the pandemic showed no cases of transmission in school settings.* The paper, sadly, but not surprisingly concludes that children should be vaccinated!* Bam! We are back to the main agenda again. All roads lead to Rome, whether they make sense or not.This paper also has multiples of issues that have been pointed out including that the data was obtained with the Abbott PCR test, that is not intended for this type of purpose, that it is from a hospital setting, the size is limited, and the reporting is biased leaving specific indicators, assays and analyses out while focusing on what the authors were trying to conclude.”This analysis relies on not just a small sample but also one primarily obtained from a hospital setting as well as from mild to moderate patients with no additional weighting for the incredibly small incidence of this population within the under-10 population. This study has been interpreted as young people are more likely to carry higher viral load and that in no way is the outcome of this dataset.”
4. Paper 2: The study is not really saying what the article says. The study provided in the link is not based on infections, it is based on positive test results. This simply means that when a child tested positive for Covid-19 in a household so did adults in the same household. Not much of a shock to me!- The study is NOT peer reviewed, and it admits that that adult to adult transmission ends up in more infections. A, yeah! That is what we call a real transmission. – The study is funded by Chan-Zuckerberg Foundation! Hello Mark and Priscilla, now you know why Mark has started censoring Covid-19 related truth and began doing vaccine interviews with Fauci on FB.- CZ Foundation is a pharmaceutical conglomerate that works on novel technology with unlimited funding and fearless young scientists – their claim to fame is the injectible nano-chip, Covid-19 testing and their involvement in contact tracing and data gathering around the world.So, I will go ahead and write this article off as a PR piece backed by dark money aimed at putting fear into trusting citizens to stay in lock down, keep their kids at home, shut down schools probably until there is a vaccine.How evil must a plan be to make a society fear its own children!!!!LINKS BELOW for THE INFORMED CLASS:- Fear-mongering Forbes article:
Photo attached with William Haseltine’s organization ACCESS Health International’s funds received from Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationFYI: If anyone thinks I should not be diving into the data and papers because I am not a licensed doctor, I will not respond to such idiotic commentary and instead recommend that YOU ALL START DIVING INTO DATA and PAPERS. Because the truth is being hidden and manipulated, and we are being lied to through the institutions we trust. God bless you all!
July 27, 2020 — There are not 85 babies with COVID in Corpus Christi, Texas right now as the Mainstream Media (MSM) would have you believe. Rather 85 children under the age of one have tested positive for cornoavirusover the past 5 months, which would average out to merely 17 per month.
None of those infants have died.
How many of them actually got sick? How many of them showed no signs of sickness at all? How many of them were actually false-positive tests? That info is not told to us and the MSM didn’t ask such questions; from the pathetic CNN all the way up to America’s oldest news agency, the Associated Press. Instead of doing their job, they chose to rush publication and induce fear into every American that a wave of COVID baby deaths is coming. Utter nonsense!
(note – CNN has recently changed its headline, adding the words “since March,” but that was not their original headline)
The only news organization to publish a clarification was KRIS 6 NEWS, a local NBC affiliate in Corpus Christi, Texas. I can’t even count how many times I’ve seen a local network affiliate get a story correct while the national networks either get it wrong or refuse to publish their own affiliate’s reporting. The MSM in 2020 is a joke, with rare exception.
Dead Baby Fear Mongering
This is not the first time the MSM has tried to scare the crap out of the public with lies about babies dying from COVID.
Does anyone remember the strange illness in children “similar to toxic shock syndrome and/or Kawasaki disease” that the MSM was linking to COVID? On May 8th I published a report about that which Children’s Health Defense (CHD) referenced in their extremely comprehensive articlepublished on May 14th covering the issue of this “strange illness” that looked almost exactly like Kawaski’s disease.
That strange illness scared the hell out of parents, but has since vanished. Why has it vanished? Because it had *nothing* to do with COVID. It has long been documented that Kawasaki’s disease can be caused from vaccinations; in fact the illness is listed as a potential adverse event on the package inserts of many vaccines that are on the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule. Many children missed their pediatrician “well visits” during the COVID lockdown and, upon seeing their doctors again, received multiple vaccinations at once because they were “off schedule” and it is very profitable for pediatricians to administer vaccines. It is highly likely the “strange illness” was happening in recently vaccinated children who were having adverse reactions to the vaccines. No one has done any investigation into this highly likely possibility.
If I am correct, that would certainly explain why the story has disappeared. The MSM never covers real medical news of adverse reactions to vaccines because they are cowards and Big Pharma sponsored prostitutes. I apologize for any harm my words may have on prostitutes, as they are far more honorable human beings than the overwhelming majority of despicable scoundrels in newsrooms today; many of whom sadly suffer from substance abuse as a way to cope with their complete lack of morals or integrity in their careers.
It was also recently reported that a 9-year-old died from the novel coronavirus in Florida. However according to a report from FOX 13 Tampa Bay the girl went to the hospital on July 11th due to a fever and stomach ache, where she was given “Tylenol and a couple of shots” (emphasis added) but was not tested for coronavirus. Six days later she was found unresponsive after a day of playing with family and friends. Family members performed CPR on her until EMS arrived. After she was pronounced dead, a coronavirus test was performed and this is the only evidence she was “COVID positive” at the time of death.
I have a lot of questions.
What “shots” were given 6 days earlier?
Was one of the shots administered a Gardasil/HPV vaccine? **
Did she recover from her earlier symptoms?
Did she have COVID symptoms on the day she passed?
Why was she “playing with family and friends” if she was sick with COVID?
What test was used to determine this girl was COVID positive?
What is the false-positive rate of the test used?
These seem like simple, common sense questions that should be asked before saying this girl died of COVID. The truth is we don’t know what this poor girl tragically died from. This is absolutely a tragic occurrence, but to claim this is certainly a death of COVID-19 defies logic and basic investigative questioning. Are we now to believe that children can feel well enough to be outside playing with friends and family, but then just drop dead from COVID that they didn’t show symptoms of having at the time of death? At this point in time this appears to be the picture painted in front of us. Hopefully at some point the grieving family will be able to reveal more to the public about what precisely transpired as a public service to everyone.
This girl is said to be 1 out of 5 children who died of COVID in Florida. However I have seen no details regarding the other 4 deaths. Were these also children who were tested posthumously?
Back on April 6th I reported about children in Georgia and Connecticut who were said to have died of the coronavirus but had not. Lying about children dying from COVID has been an unfortunate trend over the past 5 months. We cannot believe what we are being told on face value. Everything must be questioned and investigated – independently and thoroughly – as the MSM has lost all credibility and cannot be relied upon as the final arbiter of truth.
** Footnote: The reason I want to know if this 9-year-old girl received a Gardasil/HPV vaccine is because of her age. The CDC recommends the HPV vaccine can be given as early as the age of 9. It is possible – even though the girl had symptoms of being sick – that the hospital could have administered this vaccine which would explain why it was reported she was given “a couple of shots” implying more than 1 injection was given.
***Update – May 11, 2020 – 8-year-old Jayden Hardowar is still alive, thank god, according to ABC News. The boy flat lined, having no pulse at all after cardiac arrest, but he is well and recovering. My below report still stands with a few minor changes to it since the NY Post was wrong to report Jadyden had passed away.
***
May 8, 2020 — If you read the entire report from The NY Post, it seems far more likely this boy suffered of something “similar to toxic shock syndrome and/or Kawasaki disease,” not from the novel coronavirus. It is also questionable as to whether the ventilator helped or hindered his condition, as it is now an established fact 85% of all COVID-19 patients placed on a ventilator die.
However this boy was not a COVID-19 patient.
8-year-old Jayden Hardowar from Richmond Hill got sick, was rushed to Jamaica Hospital, then transferred to Cohen’s Children’s Hospital, placed on a ventilator and the NY Post incorrectly reported that the boy then died. The hospital ran a blood test and found antibodies for the novel coronavirus.
That is not a confirmation of illness from the coronavirus.
15 other NYC children have been hospitalized with a similar disease that according to The NY Post is “similar to toxic shock syndrome and/or Kawasaki disease” and only 4 of them tested positive for the novel coronavirus. That means 74% of these children were not infected with coronavirus when they were diagnosed with this mysterious illness. Nevertheless The NY Post – and the entire Mainstream Media (MSM) – feel very comfortable saying this “mystery disease” is linked to the coronavirus.
To be clear, it is possible the novel coronavirus is playing some contributive role in this rare illness in children. It is also very possible it is playing absolutely no role. However there are so many other factors and considerations that need to be discussed and investigated. The Post doesn’t discuss anything other than, “possibly linked to the coronavirus.” Other factors to investigate include:
What is the vaccine history of these 15 children?
Were any of these children recently vaccinated?
Were any of these children recently exposed to environmental toxins?
Have the children’s homes been inspected for possible toxins or mold?
How much electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) were in the children’s homes?
All of this – and more – needs to be investigated before anyone rushes to say these deaths are “possibly linked to the coronavirus.”
I’m going to do some speculation here. One thing I know a lot of Queens parents are doing to their children in lockdown is keeping them indoors 24/7. Jayden’s father is quoted in The Post article as saying they were all “practicing our social distancing very diligently.” I personally know dozens of children in NYC right now whose parents will not let them take even one step outside of their house, and I believe this to be true for at least many thousands of children in NYC. That means for over 50 days thousands of kids have been trapped in their homes.
If your home has an unknown mold or other toxin being released into the air regularly, and you keep your children in that home without ever getting any fresh air or sunlight, you can be doing irreparable damage to that child. Chronic exposure to toxins is precisely what causes Kawasaki disease. Children may also be getting much more exposure to electromagnetic frequencies within their homes from increased screen time, close proximity to routers, TV’s, smart devices (like an Amazon Firestick) or even electrical panels: all of these can be detrimental to health.
Spring is here and it is beautiful outside. Everyone needs to walk in the sun and breathe the air outdoors to maintain good health. If you feel the need to wear a mask and gloves as you do it, fine – BUT DO IT!
***
***Update — There are peer-reviewed studies in the medical literature showing Kawasaki disease can be caused from adverse reactions to vaccination:
Fed Up Democrat 
You must be logged in to post a comment.